Compact mix and match.

  1. george

    offline
    Member

    I really like having a chain ring in the 52/53 combined with 34/36 small ring. Very difficult finding that combination without having to pay an arm or leg.
    I was able to find new take off rings in 52/38 on Ebay for $50 in 110BCD and switched my 50/34 crankset to a 52/36 ( had the 36 already) giving me a combination I personally prefer.
    I realize it's not everybody's cup of tea but it is mine.


    Posted 5 months ago
  2. 79pmooney

    offline
    Member

    110BCD is such a useful standard! In the future, you might look up Sugino and see what 110BCD rings they make. I don't know, but it wouldn't surprise me if they did both of those.

    Now you do know that the 52-36 10 speed is not a new concept, don't you? My 1967 Peugeot UO08 came with that exact gearing.

    Ben

    Posted 5 months ago
  3. Keith RIchards

    offline
    Moderator

    I think 52/36 is ideal. It was what the first pros who were using compact were running.

    It is his word versus ours. We like our word. We like where we stand and we like our credibility."--Lance Armstrong.
    Posted 5 months ago
  4. george

    offline
    Member

    Ben, I know that combination has been around an awfully long time,gives you the best option for varied terrain. That's why I scratch my head wondering why that is not as readily available as standard or compact.
    I ride in the big ring at least 80-85% of the time but when I need the small ring for longer climbs or very steep grades,having a 36 as opposed to a 39 can be a Godsend for my old limbs.

    Posted 5 months ago
  5. Jah

    offline
    Member

    52/36 is in the new shimano lineup for Dura Ace and SCRAM has had it available as an option for a year or so (their only redeeming quality). What was old is new once again, I think you will start seeing a bunch of OEM

    http://www.shimano.com/publish/content/global_cycle/en/us/index/products/road/dura_ace.html

    You are correct Bob, you can spend almost as much on a set of chainrings of quality as you can on a crank itself. I prefer man gears, tried compact a few times and I don't like the feel. robs my tranquilo

    Posted 5 months ago
  6. 79pmooney

    offline
    Member

    Bob, for me the breakthrough was the 53-42 and tight cluster of my racing days. Spent most of my time on the 32 when not actually racing. Still love that combo, but I've used a 28t third ring since I hung up my racing bike 3 decades ago. Conveniently, as I age, cassette manufactures keep adding cogs so I can still ride my favorite 13-19 FW cogs! I'm still on 9 cogs so I'm good for a while!

    Ben

    Posted 5 months ago
  7. Gonzo Cyclist

    offline
    Member

    what are you running for a cassette bobswire?
    You must be a beast with all of those hills in S.F.!!!!

    Photobucket
    Posted 5 months ago
  8. george

    offline
    Member

    Gonzo@what are you running for a cassette bobswire?
    12-27 or 11-28. I'll probably go to a Tiagra 12-30 10 speed for some climbs in the Bay Area after all I'm 67.

    Posted 5 months ago
  9. KidWok

    offline
    Member

    I remember seeing something about 52/36 coming as a standard option from several manufacturers in 2013...I think Campy in addition to the above listed. I'm still able to get up most anything in a 39 x 27, but probably not for much longer. The power is going down and the weight is going up...I don't even want to think about the ratio.

    Tai

    Posted 5 months ago

Reply

You must log in to post.